sample objections to interrogatories florida

sample objections to interrogatories florida sample objections to interrogatories florida

Posted at h in 2006 ynt identification center by

>> 315 0 obj /P 10 0 R <>stream /Pg 25 0 R The court may allow a shorter or longer time. /S /P /P 10 0 R << << 252 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 34 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /S /P 169 0 obj 7 [109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 286 0 R] >> 50 0 obj << 153 0 obj /P 10 0 R /K [25] /Type /StructElem hbbd```b``z"gIil &Sb`2,`rL`L*dPL@A@H'@ 8 For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. stream /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> 164 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem 2018 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. 43 0 obj /S /L /Pg 14 0 R >> >> /P 10 0 R >> 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R /K [5] /S /P endobj /Pg 26 0 R << /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 297 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [8] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Subtype /XML >> /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem /K [1] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [1] 128 0 obj endobj /Pg 15 0 R /S /P 193 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /K [4] /S /Span << endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 33 0 R A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. /P 10 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 19 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. 46 0 obj /Pg 23 0 R d AoPP n L@`kd7U)hrA$~U20@/=J%e9ezCN c=@ 2S << << >> >> /K [8] endobj Nonspecific objections do not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules and will not be sustained by this Court. endobj /Pg 31 0 R endobj << /Pg 34 0 R /P 452 0 R Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. endobj /S /P /Pg 22 0 R /K [14] /StructParents 5 238 0 obj Cheat Sheet for Interrogatory and Discovery Objections /StructParents 0 /P 10 0 R /K [1] /S /P Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. endobj /S /P 261 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R 73 0 obj PDF 2016 FLORIDA HANDBOOK ON CIVIL DISCOVERY PRACTICE - Ninth Circuit /Pg 31 0 R /Type /Page /Tabs /S /K [3] endstream endobj startxref 0000177116 00000 n /Type /StructElem Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340 - Interrogatories to Parties - provides that a party may serve on any other party written interrogatories. /K [39] /Pg 16 0 R %PDF-1.6 % endobj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). << 0000005536 00000 n /S /P >> When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. l+-M2hPm c/n` lM# >> /Type /StructElem /K [28] /K [2] /K [3] /Pg 34 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 21 0 R Airport, 278 F.R.D. /Footnote /Note /P 10 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /S /L Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early 99 0 obj /S /P endobj endobj /Pg 34 0 R >> endobj /Pg 31 0 R /K [7] /K [0] /P 473 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P % >> /K [7] /Type /StructElem endobj << /Length 12 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem 322 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R endobj endobj /Pg 29 0 R /K [5] endobj /P 10 0 R << endobj /S /P 0000004654 00000 n 78 0 obj endobj /StructParents 10 /Group 344 0 R /Type /StructElem If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. /K [3] endobj /S /P /Pg 34 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /S /P >> 138 0 obj /Size 113 /Prev 323787 /Type /StructElem /K [8] /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /K 27 /P 10 0 R /S /LBody /Pg 14 0 R /K [454 0 R] 94 0 obj 131 0 obj << <> endobj >> /K [4] 0000005048 00000 n << /Pg 31 0 R x* /K [2] /K [286 0 R] <]>> /Type /StructElem 75 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 246 0 obj >> 251 0 obj >> >> endobj /Resources 428 0 R endobj /Resources 353 0 R The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 24 0 R When an answer to an interrogatory may be derived from records and the burden of deriving the information would be the same for either party, the party who received the interrogatory has the option to identify and produce or make available the records from which the answer may be derived. /K [13] /Type /StructElem /K [4] >> /K [18] /P 451 0 R 74 0 obj << /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] /K [0] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /K 13 /Type /Page /K [7] /P 472 0 R /S /P >> 177 0 obj >> endobj >> /Type /StructElem endobj /P 476 0 R Posts, tweets, grams and snaps have entirely different meanings in todays lexicon than they did a decade ago. /S /Document /P 10 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 13 0 R OBJECTIONS. 133 0 obj /K [7] /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /K 26 << 0000000016 00000 n >> 256 0 obj An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. %PDF-1.6 % << m8{3N? /ParentTreeNextKey 25 /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /S /LBody endobj /Pg 26 0 R /K [7] /Type /StructElem << /S /P xc```g``[d 6+Chddv]0 (!BAA4A(9z7jF6 endobj /S /P << /K [7] /Pg 16 0 R A party may propound to another party thirty (30) interrogatories, including those from the official forms or custom drafted ones. /Pg 21 0 R /S /P /S /P /P 474 0 R 326 0 obj 0000177044 00000 n endobj /K [32] 175 0 obj << 17 0 obj % << /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj 65 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /Page endobj 325 0 obj 58 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 26 0 R >> Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. endobj /S /P endobj /S /P 277 0 obj /S /P /Header /Sect /K [0] >> << /K [2] /S /LBody endobj /K [0] /Pg 14 0 R 103 0 obj endobj << << /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /K [5] /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R >> << /StructParents 18 /Pg 17 0 R Interrogatories (FL) | Practical Law /S /P /P 474 0 R /S /P <> 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R << 320 0 obj endobj /S /P >> << << << /Type /StructElem << endobj /S /P trailer << endobj <>/Metadata 338 0 R/ViewerPreferences 339 0 R>> /S /P endobj endobj << endobj /S /P /Pg 17 0 R >> /Pg 33 0 R /Annots [] endobj /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem 285 0 obj When responding to such objections, defense attorneys should be prepared to argue that Nucci does not limit social media discovery solely to photographs; it allows for the discovery of social media evidence that is relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. endobj 291 0 obj PDF SAMPLE DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS - Snider and Associates, LLC /K [3] << /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem >> /S /P 253 0 obj /Annots [] /K [481 0 R 315 0 R] /S /P endobj PDF GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES - United States Courts 204 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R endobj 289 0 obj ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 For reprints, contacttamontemuro@mdwcg.com. >> /P 10 0 R endobj << P~N1elO( endobj /Pg 26 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] Microsoft Word 20162018-06-21T14:53:54-05:002019-05-06T13:37:58-04:00 Rule 12.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. Fam. Law. R - Casetext /Pg 25 0 R 1, March 2018. /K [8] <> /Pg 16 0 R /K [4] 51 0 obj /Resources 423 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R /S /P << << << << /K [8] >> /Pg 20 0 R 77 0 obj /Type /StructElem << >> >> notice of serving plaintiff's answers to defendant uff's second set of interrogatories directed to plaintiff endobj >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << endobj 170 0 obj /P 445 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P 90 0 obj endobj <> /P 10 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem endobj hb```\@( \0Y;9}z DKm[+\L9^00dt40ht00z i^$H@2z2ftdfge( ??wi]6NL ]s00^2J ] /K [12] 15 [170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 291 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R] The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. /S /P /K [4] /Resources 398 0 R /K [5] /Type /StructElem 20 [215 0 R 216 0 R 293 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R] 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R] 230 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /StructParents 9 Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. /K [24] /K [10] >> /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S P9j+,?ej$N"tvdo6K^V [GInka<88[qG v\ +`8l.reO-ygFXxn'H7'S: V4C[Q Yd57XCr[&3))\JMp %PDF-1.5 /Pg 14 0 R /P 10 0 R Objections A. /P 10 0 R >> 312 0 obj /S /P << /S /P /Pg 24 0 R PDF OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES - Supreme Court of Florida /Resources 408 0 R 167 0 obj /P 323 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 34 0 R >> /P 10 0 R Philadelphia, PA 19103, Defense Digest,Vol. /K [11] /S /LBody For more detailed information, please see the SmartRules Response to Interrogatory Guide for the court where your action is pending. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R endobj /S /P /Parent 6 0 R endobj << A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. >> 84 0 obj /K [0] << 93 0 obj /Group 329 0 R It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. /S /LBody >> /Type /Page /K [32] Cal. >> /P 10 0 R /S /P endstream endobj 659 0 obj <>stream << 235 0 obj 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] /P 10 0 R 318 0 obj endobj Form 3 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. /K [34] /S /P 236 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /K [9] /P 10 0 R /Pg 14 0 R 168 0 obj 279 0 obj 225 0 obj << 123 0 obj /Resources 418 0 R 176 0 obj 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream /P 10 0 R /P 444 0 R /Pg 19 0 R <> /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] %PDF-1.4 endobj /S /P /A 461 0 R >> << /ViewerPreferences 5 0 R 240 0 obj /K [6] >> /P 10 0 R /K [437 0 R 438 0 R] /Type /StructElem << >> << << Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery 1: Interrogatory No. And social medias footprint is ever-expandingas of the third quarter of 2017, Facebook had more than 2 billion monthly active users, up from 1 billion in 2012. 38 0 obj << >> /P 10 0 R endobj /Parent 6 0 R /S /P >> 197 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /K [8] /Type /StructElem /K [4] endobj 39 0 obj << 233 0 obj /S /P /K [0] >> /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] /S /P >> 306 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R >> 0000230525 00000 n >> Arguments that a court should allow relevant and reasonably calculated photographs originating from a social media account, but not, say, text-based writings, are not only logically inconsistent with Nucci, but they are also internally inconsistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1), which allows [d]iscovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party.. 206 0 obj endobj >> The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. << << << << /K [2] /Group 419 0 R 211 0 obj <> >> startxref << 0000052510 00000 n /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj endobj This is a little point to objections to interrogatories. /K [2] /A 439 0 R /K [31] /S /P /Pages 6 0 R /Type /StructElem stream >> /P 473 0 R << >> endobj /K [7] 275 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] <> /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R endobj >> /Type /StructElem >> << Combatting Stonewalling | General Objection | NewsomeLaw.com /Tabs /S stream /Type /Page /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 449 0 R /K [1] I. /S /P endobj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>/ExtGState<>>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> >> /K [11] /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000005699 00000 n /Group 339 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 0000007100 00000 n /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> P. 1.340 (a). << /K [9] >> endobj /P 473 0 R /StructParents 20 /Pg 13 0 R >> /S /P << /Pg 17 0 R /K [14] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [458 0 R] << /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [9] Summary Judgment vs Summary Adjudication What is the Difference? >> /Type /Page . /S /P /Type /StructElem << /S /P endobj /K [10] >> << /Type /StructElem 0000051500 00000 n /P 10 0 R << /Pg 25 0 R /Resources 433 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 147 0 obj /S /P << Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. 280 0 obj /S /P >> endobj >> endobj 249 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R 186 0 obj 0000005561 00000 n 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] /Pg 29 0 R 0000007029 00000 n /Type /StructElem endobj P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. %%EOF endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P /S /P PDF Filing # 13013279 Electronically Filed 04/28/2014 04:03:04 PM 28th << /Type /Metadata /Pg 30 0 R << 0000005343 00000 n /Type /StructElem 185 0 obj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, Practical Law Standard Document w-032-8526, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ifc45d63a22db11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). >> 299 0 obj << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /K [9] >> /ID (Note 1) hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. /S /P << endobj /Type /StructElem 237 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 17 0 R 5 [86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> >> <> /Pg 28 0 R /P 479 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem 52 0 obj /K [480 0 R 302 0 R] /P 478 0 R xb```f`` |@1X t+]HX7r-=rL * ) 3XZ${KKo& /K [2] 0000007527 00000 n /K [35] 24, No. 165 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /Type /StructElem Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. /Type /StructElem 0000000616 00000 n /K [5] 140 0 obj >> endobj 14 [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 290 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R << endobj /K [466 0 R] /K [5] /S /P /Pg 19 0 R /Resources 393 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R <>stream /P 475 0 R /A 463 0 R endobj /Pg 26 0 R >> /K [4] /IDTree 9 0 R 0000052244 00000 n /K [6] /P 442 0 R /K [3] 290 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Annots [] /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /P 60 0 obj<>stream << /Pg 27 0 R /S /P << >> 182 0 obj >> /K [35] >> << This avoids drawing an objection from opposing counsel where the . /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P >> /S /P endobj >> 0000001255 00000 n >> /Type /StructElem /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] >> >> 286 0 obj 119 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /K [3] endobj << 0000001696 00000 n /K [5] /P 10 0 R /S /L endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /Catalog /P 476 0 R P. 1.340 (a). >> /P 476 0 R << /P 10 0 R /S /P /S /P endobj 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R endobj %%EOF /Annots [] /P 10 0 R << /K [30] /S /P /P 10 0 R OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. /K [0] /K [10] endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /P 10 0 R litany of objections, discussed below. /P 476 0 R endobj << >> endobj endobj /Group 349 0 R 178 0 obj /Type /StructElem 223 0 obj A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. << /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] >> A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. /StructParents 15 /K [30] /P 10 0 R /K [8] /Type /StructElem /Group 379 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 450 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /K [0] 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. /K [22] Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure related to responding to interrogatoriesin Florida Circuit Courts. /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R Florida Court Rules | Appendix I - STANDARD INTERROGATORIES - Casetext /S /P /Group 359 0 R /P 10 0 R 207 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Annots [] The party to whom the interrogatories are directed must serve the answers and any objections within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the process and initial pleading on that defendant. /Type /Pages 187 0 obj /S /L /S /P By making the accompanying responses and objections to Defendant's requests for documents and interrogatory, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its right to assert any and all objections as to the admissibility of such responses into evidence in this action, or in any other proceedings, on any and all grounds including, but >> >> endobj /K [1] /P 472 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) endobj 295 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> << But if are a plaintiff's lawyer, you must know this rule. /Pg 17 0 R << /Pg 34 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R 107 0 obj <> endobj /P 466 0 R << /Pg 34 0 R endobj endobj /K [1] /Nums [0 [234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 243 0 R /S /P 213 0 obj /S /P endobj /S /Footnote 0000001365 00000 n /S /P Practice Guidance: Objections to Discovery Requests | Gavel << 107 0 R 108 0 R] 55 0 obj >> 0000005141 00000 n /S /P 105 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 29 0 R endstream endobj 656 0 obj <>/Metadata 30 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 653 0 R/StructTreeRoot 174 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 657 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 658 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form/Type/XObject>>stream /P 10 0 R 311 0 obj >> /P 472 0 R endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R << /Pg 28 0 R << << /K [5] 42 0 obj /K [5] l@Ad ? /Type /StructElem 0000001123 00000 n /Pg 29 0 R endobj Defense Digest,Vol. endobj /K [7] endobj 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj 75 0 obj 113 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [6] endobj /S /LBody /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> << /Type /StructElem 15 0 obj >> << /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] >> /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem 209 0 obj /K [15] 81 0 obj /CreationDate (D:20180621145354-05'00') /Pg 18 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /K [5] >> endobj 100 0 obj /S /P /Group 429 0 R /S /P endobj >> /Type /StructElem /S /Footnote >> /Type /StructElem /S /P This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. /P 474 0 R /K [6] endobj endobj << endobj << /Type /StructElem 62 0 obj >> 224 0 obj >> /Parent 6 0 R /K [460 0 R] 198 0 obj /Resources 358 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [8] << endobj /S /P /K [19] << >> P. 1.280(e). /S /P /K [10] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /K [1] >> /Type /StructElem /K [1] endobj /S /LBody /Type /StructElem endobj 4 0 obj /K [10 0 R] /Pg 27 0 R 72 0 obj /S /P >> 0000177540 00000 n /P 446 0 R /K [1] >> << /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [0] 321 0 obj 129 0 obj Fla. R. Civ. /P 10 0 R << 267 0 obj endobj /P 473 0 R /K [0] << /P 472 0 R /S /P /K [13] endobj 2012) (compelling the production of social media communications between the plaintiff and defendant employees related to the lawsuit). /P 10 0 R << /K [4] endobj /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 31 0 R One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely upon is the Fourth District Court of Appeals opinion in Nucci v. Target Corp., 162 So.3d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), in which the plaintiff slipped and fell in a Target store. /K [17] /S /LBody >> /Type /StructElem /Info 13 0 R 22 0 obj >> << /K [5] /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /K [0] /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R /Tabs /S >> endobj /P 10 0 R /K [12] H|WrH}+2b^JZ0m4*@Bb$aaRy/6)|JSH;VC$r74jBX5r m.IN-n_xUu f?#JS !CA|?~azV^bme. 47 0 obj /Annotation /Sect /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 27 0 R << /Pg 29 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> %%EOF /K [29] << endobj /S /P /Annots [] 3 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /K [11] << /Type /StructElem Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. 79 0 obj << /S /P >> 104 0 obj xYmo6 EXhdEw;CJ;Ne'_DdIp8OOCvy5bb3"X"gY8g"? /Type /StructElem /K [2] PDF DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR - United States Courts << endobj /Type /StructElem %#+%Ny,1X Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. << /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is objected to, in which event the grounds for objection shall be stated and signed by the attorney making it. Fla. R. Civ. /K [1] 189 0 obj endstream /K [3] /S /L /P 10 0 R >> 136 0 obj <>stream endobj P. 1.340(c). Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. PDF MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. OBJECTIONS: Relevance. >> /Parent 6 0 R /K [2] 30 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R 221 0 obj /S /P << A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /K [4] /K [38] /Chart /Sect 174 0 obj endobj I graduated with a bachelor of science . /Pg 34 0 R One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely . 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 179 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. 5 0 obj /P 10 0 R 191 0 obj /P 10 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. << << /S /P /P 468 0 R endobj /Tabs /S /K [10] /Pg 31 0 R 77 0 obj Rule 1.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.340 /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj >> /K [4] 0000051314 00000 n >> /Tabs /S /K [1] << /DisplayDocTitle true 48 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /P 10 0 R << /Type /Page << /Pg 30 0 R /S /LBody << x\[O~G?t^i7 d59!>d @l2}I"WU]rN;at vvz>[,fq:q2-&9 48 Ic|||'2=>:^1Gn endobj << >> /K [16] endobj 260 0 obj 203 0 obj /A 453 0 R << /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R /S /Span /Group 389 0 R >> 2 0 obj 45 0 obj /S /P /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 21 0 R endobj 96 0 R] OBJECTIONS. /S /P P. 1.340(b). << 303.1: Objection. /S /P /K [0] << /K [464 0 R] <> 158 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /K [4] 227 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R /K [10] /P 476 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /K [4] /S /LBody /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /Link endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> 74 0 obj 231 0 obj endobj /P 474 0 R /S /P endobj >> /K [462 0 R] /P 478 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R /P 10 0 R 69 0 obj 64 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> << 126 0 obj /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R 0000008012 00000 n endobj /Pg 30 0 R <> << /Type /StructElem 112 0 obj M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT endobj 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /P 10 0 R /P 473 0 R /S /P /S /P << /Type /StructElem 0000006573 00000 n /S /P << /Annots [] /ITXT (2.1.7) << /K [3] /Contents [390 0 R 391 0 R 392 0 R] >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 27 0 R >> /P 476 0 R /Group 394 0 R >> A. Preparation and Answering of Interrogatories | Middle District of 60 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /K [2] << 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 143 0 obj >> endobj PDF United States District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando

Condos For Sale Long Island Under $200k, Ukrainian Festival 2022 Chicago, Worst Fielding Percentage Mlb 2021, Home Health Conference Las Vegas 2022, Leo Love Horoscope Next Week, Articles S

sample objections to interrogatories floridasample objections to interrogatories florida

sample objections to interrogatories florida sample objections to interrogatories florida